For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.
Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.
In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.
Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap.
Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?
Resources
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 1, “Nursing Science and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 7–17)
Chapter 2, “Introduction to Information, Information Science, and Information Systems” (pp. 21–32)
Chapter 3, “Computer Science and the Foundation of Knowledge Model” (pp. 35–64)
Nagle, L., Sermeus, W., & Junger, A. (2017). Evolving Role of the Nursing Informatics SpecialistLinks to an external site.. In J. Murphy, W. Goosen, & P. Weber (Eds.), Forecasting Competencies for Nurses in the Future of Connected Health (212-221). Clifton, VA: IMIA and IOS Press. Retrieved from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4A0FEA5…
Sweeney, J. (2017). Healthcare informaticsLinks to an external site.. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 21(1).
NURS_5051_Module01_Week01_Discussion_RubricNURS_5051_Module01_Week01_Discussion_RubricCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting50 to >44.0 ptsExcellentAnswers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.44 to >39.0 ptsGoodResponds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.39 to >34.0 ptsFairResponds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.34 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness10 to >0.0 ptsExcellentPosts main post by day 3.0 ptsPoorDoes not post by day 3.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response18 to >16.0 ptsExcellentResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.16 to >14.0 ptsGoodResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.14 to >12.0 ptsFairResponse is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.12 to >0 ptsPoorResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response17 to >15.0 ptsExcellentResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.15 to >13.0 ptsGoodResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.13 to >11.0 ptsFairResponse is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.11 to >0 ptsPoorResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation5 to >0.0 ptsExcellentMeets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.0 ptsPoorDoes not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!
Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling Your Assignment:
1. Understand the Assignment:
In this assignment, you need to reflect on a healthcare scenario where data plays a crucial role. You are expected to consider how data can be used to solve a problem, improve outcomes, and contribute to knowledge formation. This means looking at how data could help in a real-world situation within a healthcare setting.
2. Choose a Relevant Healthcare Scenario:
Think about a situation you have encountered in healthcare (either as a student, professional, or from your knowledge) where access to data would make a difference. For example, it could be about:
- Improving patient care
- Tracking medication errors
- Reducing hospital readmission rates
- Enhancing communication among the nursing staff or between departments
Select a scenario that would benefit from data collection and analysis. Ensure that the situation is realistic and involves a problem that could be solved through better data usage.
3. Describe the Focus of Your Scenario:
Once you have chosen a scenario, describe it clearly in your post. Provide background information:
- What is the issue or problem? (e.g., high medication errors in a hospital setting)
- Why is data important in solving this problem? (e.g., tracking medication errors over time could reveal patterns and root causes)
Make sure to provide enough context for the reader to understand the significance of the scenario.
4. Identify the Data:
Describe the specific data that would be needed to solve the problem. Consider:
- What kind of data would be helpful? (e.g., patient outcomes, medication administration logs, staff performance data, etc.)
- Where will the data come from? (e.g., electronic health records, hospital databases, patient surveys)
- How will it be collected? (e.g., through automated systems, manual entry by staff, real-time monitoring)
Provide concrete examples of the data you would use to understand and address the problem.
5. Explain the Knowledge Derived from the Data:
Once the data is collected, think about what knowledge might be gained. For example:
- Trends in medication errors: What patterns can be seen (time of day, specific departments, certain drugs)?
- Patient outcomes: How does the data show improvements or declines in health outcomes after specific interventions?
Explain how this data would help the nursing team or healthcare providers make better decisions and improve care.
6. Clinical Reasoning and Judgment:
Describe how a nurse leader would use clinical reasoning and judgment in making decisions based on the data. Reflect on:
- How does the nurse leader interpret the data? (e.g., understanding the root causes of medication errors)
- How would the leader decide on actions based on this data? (e.g., implementing training for staff, revising medication protocols)
Think about how the nurse leader uses their experience, knowledge, and critical thinking skills to act on the data and improve care delivery.
7. Support Your Ideas with Evidence:
To back up your arguments, use at least three credible, current sources. This could include course readings, textbooks, or recent peer-reviewed articles. These sources will support your points about how data is used in healthcare and the role of nursing informatics.
8. Write Clearly and Concisely:
Your post should be clear, logical, and easy to follow. Avoid long, complicated sentences. Keep your writing concise, while ensuring you provide enough detail to support your arguments.
Make sure to follow APA formatting guidelines for citations and references. This includes in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your post.
9. Participate in the Discussion:
After posting your main response, engage with your classmates. Respond to at least two of their posts, providing thoughtful feedback or asking questions. This will help deepen the discussion and show your engagement with the course material.
Each of your replies should be professional and respectful. Provide clear opinions and back them up with credible sources, demonstrating critical thinking and reflection.
By following these steps, you will be able to structure your post effectively, provide critical insights into how data can improve healthcare practices, and showcase your understanding of nursing informatics. Remember to be clear, concise, and supported by evidence throughout the process.
Good luck!
For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to your specific needs and instructions