Understanding Employee Stock Options and the FASB’s Share-Based Payment Standards

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

As part of its due process, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) gathers feedback on its
proposed standards. In many cases the organizations or persons responding provide useful information
because they provide a viewpoint the FASB has not fully considered or else provide technical information
about a particular industry or practice the FASB has failed to consider. In this assignment, you will learn some basic background about what an employee stock option is, how it
works. With that background information you are going to evaluate the arguments raised by the CFO of
Micron Technology in his letter providing feedback to the FASB on the proposed standard on share-based
payments that later was finalized as SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payments. SFAS 123R, later codified as
ASC 718, requires companies to recognize expenses using the fair value of the stock options granted to
executives and employees.
Required:
Read the first three pages of the of the article “How do employee stock options work,” by Samuel Deane
of Morningstar. Then read the comment letter from Micorn’s CFO. Write a memo using the format in
the Memo Guidelines to address the following three questions: 1. Briefly describe what an employee stock option is and how it works? Why might an employer want
to use employee stock options, vs other forms of compensation? Why might employees want
employee stock options, vs other forms of compensation?
2. The first two logical arguments raised by Micron by the main points of their memo are: a. Employee stock options granted at market price do not constitute an “expense” under present
accounting definitions, do not represent an economic cost to the issuer and should not be
recognized as a compensation expense of the issuing company.
b. The measurement methodologies and tools recommended by FASB rely significantly on
management judgments and estimates and will lead to a lack of consistency and
comparability among reported results. Do the principles in the FASB’s conceptual framework lead you to agree or disagree with each of
these two arguments raised by Micron? Discuss each argument separately, identify relevant aspects
of the conceptual framework that you believe are relevant to the arguments being made by Micron.
Be sure to explain why the conceptual framework supports or contradicts the arguments being made
by Micron.
3. Based on your general understanding of the FASB’s conceptual framework and the debate over
expensing stock-based compensation, would you support or oppose to FASB’s requirement of
recognizing stock-based compensation expense measured using fair value? Explain your answer and
provide justification for your views. Be sure to draw from the various aspects of the conceptual
framework. There is not necessarily right or wrong answer to each question. Express your opinion and back them up
with facts and reasoning, particularly reasoning based on the conceptual framework. Do some research
online. You can use all available literature as reference, including those listed below. Be sure to cite any
sources that you use to develop insights or provide direct quotes from (e.g., sections of the codification,
articles).
Your memo should be no more than four pages. You should use 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margin on all sides, double spacing in the main text and single spacing in the header.

🚨 Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily! 🚨

A memo is a professional document that presents information concisely. Below is a structured approach to help you organize your memo effectively while addressing the required points.

📌 Step 1: Understanding the Assignment

Your task is to:
✅ Explain what employee stock options (ESOs) are and their advantages for employers/employees.
✅ Analyze Micron’s two key arguments against the FASB standard using the conceptual framework.
✅ Express and justify your opinion on whether stock-based compensation should be recognized as an expense using fair value measurement.

📌 Step 2: Formatting the Memo

Your memo should follow professional formatting guidelines:

Header (Single-spaced, aligned left):
📌 To: [Professor’s Name]
📌 From: [Your Name]
📌 Date: [Submission Date]
📌 Subject: Evaluation of Micron’s Arguments on Share-Based Compensation

📌 Step 3: Writing the Memo

🔹 Introduction (1 paragraph)

✅ State the purpose of the memo – Explain that it evaluates Micron’s objections to the FASB’s share-based payment standard (SFAS 123R/ASC 718).
✅ Provide context – Briefly mention that ESOs are used as compensation and that FASB’s requirement to expense them has sparked debate.

🔸 Example:
“This memo evaluates Micron Technology’s objections to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) requirement to expense employee stock options under SFAS 123R (now codified as ASC 718). It provides an overview of employee stock options, analyzes Micron’s arguments using the FASB conceptual framework, and presents a position on the fair value recognition of stock-based compensation.”

🔹 Section 1: What Are Employee Stock Options?

✅ Define ESOs – A form of compensation giving employees the right to buy company stock at a predetermined price.
✅ Explain how ESOs work – Grant date, vesting period, exercise price, expiration.
✅ Why Employers Use ESOs:

Aligns employee incentives with company performance.
Reduces cash salary expenses.
Attracts and retains talent.
✅ Why Employees Prefer ESOs:
Potential for higher earnings if stock value rises.
Offers long-term financial benefits.
Encourages company loyalty.

🔸 Example:
“Employee stock options (ESOs) grant employees the right to purchase company stock at a predetermined price within a specified timeframe. These options typically have a vesting period before they can be exercised and an expiration date by which they must be used. Employers offer ESOs to align employees’ interests with shareholders, reduce cash-based salary expenses, and attract high-level talent. Employees benefit from ESOs as they provide potential financial gains if the company performs well.”

🔹 Section 2: Evaluating Micron’s Arguments

Argument #1: Stock options do not represent an economic cost and should not be expensed.
✅ Micron’s View:

ESOs granted at market price are not an “expense” by accounting definitions.
No immediate cash outflow occurs.
Impact is only seen in share dilution, not income statements.
✅ FASB Conceptual Framework Analysis:
Recognition Principle: Expenses must be recorded when incurred, even if they are non-cash.
Faithful Representation: ESOs provide economic benefits to employees and should be recognized as a company expense.
✅ Conclusion: Micron’s argument contradicts FASB’s principles, as ESOs represent compensation costs affecting shareholder value.

🔹 Example:
“Micron argues that employee stock options granted at market price do not constitute an expense because they do not lead to an immediate cash outflow. However, under the FASB’s conceptual framework, an expense is recognized when an entity incurs an obligation to provide future benefits. Since ESOs represent a form of compensation that impacts shareholder equity, they meet the definition of an expense under the recognition and faithful representation principles.”

Argument #2: FASB’s fair value measurement lacks consistency and comparability.
✅ Micron’s View:

Fair value models (e.g., Black-Scholes) rely on subjective management estimates.
Differences in assumptions create inconsistency across firms.
✅ FASB Conceptual Framework Analysis:
Comparability Principle: Financial statements should be comparable, but stock option valuation involves estimation variance.
Relevance & Reliability: While estimates vary, fair value provides a more accurate reflection of compensation costs than ignoring ESOs.
✅ Conclusion: While valuation methods have limitations, fair value enhances transparency and is preferable to excluding stock options from financial reports.

🔹 Example:
“Micron contends that FASB’s fair value approach leads to inconsistencies because valuation models rely on subjective management estimates. While this concern is valid under the comparability principle, the relevance and reliability principles suggest that recognizing an estimate is better than omitting stock option expenses entirely. Despite measurement challenges, fair value provides a more transparent reflection of stock-based compensation.”

🔹 Section 3: Should Stock-Based Compensation Be Expensed?

✅ Your position (Agree/Disagree with FASB’s requirement) – Clearly state if you support or oppose expensing stock-based compensation.
✅ Justification using the conceptual framework:

Relevance & Faithful Representation – ESOs affect company expenses and should be recorded.
Consistency & Comparability – While estimates vary, applying a standard approach improves financial transparency.
Investor Decision-Making – Investors need accurate financial reports to assess company performance.

🔹 Example:
“Given the principles of the FASB conceptual framework, I support expensing stock-based compensation using fair value. Recognizing stock option costs ensures faithful representation of a company’s financial obligations. While valuation models introduce estimation challenges, they provide more transparency than omitting stock options altogether. Investors rely on accurate financial statements to make informed decisions, and expensing ESOs aligns with the fundamental goal of financial reporting—providing useful and reliable information.”

🔹 Conclusion (1 paragraph)

✅ Summarize key points:

ESOs provide financial benefits to employees and align incentives.
Micron’s arguments conflict with FASB’s conceptual framework principles.
Expensing stock-based compensation using fair value enhances financial transparency.

🔸 Example:
“Employee stock options play a crucial role in compensation structures, but their impact on financial statements must be recognized. Micron’s objections, while understandable, conflict with key accounting principles such as faithful representation and relevance. While valuation challenges exist, expensing stock-based compensation using fair value improves transparency and investor confidence. Therefore, the FASB’s requirement is justified and beneficial for financial reporting integrity.”

📌 Step 4: Formatting & Final Review

✅ Check formatting:

Double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman, 1-inch margins
Professional memo format with header
✅ Proofread for clarity and conciseness.
✅ Cite any sources (APA/MLA format) if referencing external materials.

🎯 Final Tip:

📌 Stay objective and well-reasoned in your arguments. Use conceptual framework principles to support your stance rather than personal opinions.

By following this structure, your memo will be professional, well-organized, and insightful! 🚀📊

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

WRITE MY ESSAY

blitz