For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment
ENGR7008 Fire Engineering Design and Assessment
Assignment 4: Peer Review of Fire Engineering Report
ASSIGNMENT 4
PEER REVIEW OF A FIRE ENGINEERING REPORT
See Learning Guide of the unit for assignment due dates and general requirements.
Attached is a fictitious Performance Solution Report (for 211 Test Close, Parramatta – Report Number: 2024/03, Revision 1.2). You are to undertake a peer review to identify issues with the report, both substantial and minor and document this in the form of a professional peer review report.
Note: Substantial issues / errors refer to items that could lead to a highly undesirable outcome or consequence, indicate the report author does not have a fundamental understanding of fire engineering topics, or indicate a major deviation from the recommendations in the Australian Fire Engineering Guidelines.
A minor issue/error is where something may be incorrect, however it doesn’t impact the analyses or outcomes of the report.
You are to identify and describe 5 significant issues / errors and address the following:
• Identify the Section of the Report (1 mark)
• Description of the issue / error (4 marks)
• What are the potential implications if this was identified late in the design phase? (3 marks)
• What should be done to rectify this issue/error? (4 marks)
• What are the potential implications if this was not identified and the building was constructed and occupied based on a Fire Engineering Report (FER) with this issue/error also included? (3 marks)
Please ensure that at least 1 significant issue / error is identified for each performance solution analysis in Sections 12, 13 and 14 of the fictitious report (i.e. one from Section 12, one from Section 13 and one from Section 14).
You are also to identify and describe 3 minor issues / errors and address the following:
• Identify the Section of the Report (1 mark)
• Description of the issue / error (2 marks)
• What should be done to rectify this issue/error? (2 marks)
Remaining marks will be allocated to the format and presentation of your report.
Please provide your responses in a professional peer review report format which includes items such as:
• Cover Sheet
• Report identification and revision control
• Author
• Introduction
• Documentation/drawings
• Identification of the issues as outlined above (the table format shown on the following pages is to be used) • Conclusion; and
• References.
Please note:
(1) An error should only be identified once (discuss repeats of the same error as one error);
(2) Language, grammatical or typing errors with no significant consequences are not to be identified; and,
(3) Do not exceed the number of errors requested, as only the number requested will be assessed and marked.
Format for identification of issues:
Substantial Issues / Errors
# 1
Identify the Section of the Report
Description of the issue / error
What are the potential implications if this was identified late in the design phase?
What should be done to rectify this issue/error?
What are the potential implications if this was not identified and the building was constructed and occupied based on the FER with this issue/error also included?
Repeat the above for issues 2, 3 and 4
Minor Issues / Errors
# 5
Identify the Section of the Report
Description of the issue / error
What should be done to rectify this issue/error?
Repeat the above for issues 6, 7 and 8
Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!
Step-by-Step Guide for Peer Review of Fire Engineering Report
-
Understand the Assignment Scope:
- You are required to complete a peer review of a Fire Engineering Report for a fictitious building (211 Test Close, Parramatta). The goal is to identify both substantial and minor issues in the report.
- Substantial issues refer to critical errors that could have a significant impact on the safety or compliance of the fire engineering solution.
- Minor issues are smaller mistakes that do not alter the conclusions or overall quality of the report but should still be addressed.
-
Breakdown of What to Identify:
- You need to identify 5 substantial issues and 3 minor issues. The substantial issues should come from different sections of the report (12, 13, and 14). Minor issues can come from any section.
-
Identify Substantial Issues (5 total): For each substantial issue, follow these steps:
- Identify the Section of the Report: Specify which part of the report the issue is located in (e.g., Section 12, 13, or 14).
- Description of the Issue/Error: Provide a clear description of the issue, making sure to outline why it’s a problem.
- Potential Implications if Identified Late: Describe the risks or consequences if this error were found late in the design process (e.g., cost overruns, safety risks, design delays).
- How to Rectify the Issue/Error: Offer a suggestion or recommendation on how to fix the error.
- Implications if Not Identified: Discuss what could go wrong if the error is not addressed and the building is constructed based on the incorrect report (e.g., safety hazards, legal non-compliance, building code violations).
-
Identify Minor Issues (3 total): For each minor issue, follow these steps:
- Identify the Section of the Report: Again, specify which part of the report the issue appears in.
- Description of the Issue/Error: Provide a concise description of the issue, explaining why it’s considered minor.
- How to Rectify the Issue/Error: Suggest a possible solution or correction for the minor issue.
-
Format and Presentation:
- Cover Sheet: Include the assignment title, your name, student ID, and date.
- Report Identification and Revision Control: Document the report identification (e.g., “Report Number: 2024/03, Revision 1.2”) and revision control.
- Author: Specify your name as the reviewer.
- Introduction: Write an introduction explaining the purpose of the peer review and what it entails.
- Documentation/Drawings: If necessary, include any drawings or documentation to support your points.
- Identification of Issues: Use the specified table format for the identification and description of substantial and minor issues.
- Conclusion: Sum up your findings and make any final recommendations.
- References: Include any references to guidelines, reports, or standards that you consulted while conducting the peer review.
-
Final Check:
- Ensure that you have exactly 5 substantial issues and 3 minor issues as required.
- Review the report for clarity, coherence, and professionalism.
- Double-check that the errors you identified are related to fire engineering and relevant to the report’s context.
By following these steps, you’ll be able to write a comprehensive and well-structured peer review report that covers all necessary aspects.
For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to your specific needs and instructions