Evaluating Escape Extinction: Pros, Cons, and Ethical Implications

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Controversial procedure is escape extinction
In this section, fully describe the evidence-based controversial procedure identified in the announcement using information from at least one reputable source (if using more than one, at least one must be a research article from a peer reviewed journal). Describe what it might look like to implement the controversial treatment. How is the behavior originally maintained? What happens once the procedure is implemented? It can help by giving examples of how this procedure could be implemented. Include within the body of each paragraph an in-text citation for the source you obtained the information regarding the specific procedure (e.g. (Author, Date)). This section is worth 20% of your grade.
Pros to Controversial Treatment
In this section, discuss (in your own words) 3-4 pros of the identified evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these pros (i.e., explain why each pro supports the use of the controversial treatment), and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be used so you can convey your understanding in your own words. This section is worth 10% of your grade.
Cons to Controversial Treatment
In this section, discuss (in your own words) 3-4 cons of the identified evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these cons (i.e., explain why each con opposes the use of the controversial treatment), and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be used, as you can convey your understanding in your own words. This section is worth 10% of your grade.
Evaluation of Ethics
In this section, evaluate the evidence-based controversial treatment using at least four of the BACB ethics codes and justify your opinion on the topic. Provide the specific code numbers and titles of the codes you discuss. Do not copy/paste the code description; instead, explain them in your own words to avoid plagiarism and demonstrate academic scholarly work. Discuss how each code relates to the treatment and analyze both how a behavior analyst could potentially violate the code and how they could act in alignment with it. For example: “A behavior analyst might violate Ethics Code X.XX if they were to recommend the use of [treatment] because…. On the other hand, they could demonstrate alignment with the ethics code if they were to….” Cite and reference the . Finally, for a distinguished score, make sure to summarize whether you would recommend the treatment based on the pros, cons, and ethics codes to justify your opinion. This section is worth 40% of your grade. BACB Ethics Codes for Behavior Analysts. Finally, for a distinguished score, make sure to summarize whether you would recommend the treatment based on the pros, cons, and ethics codes to justify your opinion. This section is worth 40% of your grade.
Conclusion
In academic writing, the conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research/discussion points should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. A conclusion is not merely a summary of your points or a re-statement of your research problem/discussion but a synthesis of key points.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Introduction

The first step in tackling any assignment is understanding what the assignment is asking. For this paper, you’ll need to explore the controversial procedure of escape extinction and provide a thorough analysis. Here’s how you can break it down:

Step-by-Step Guide to Structuring Your Paper

1. Start with a Title

Your title should clearly reflect the main subject. For example:
“Evaluating Escape Extinction: A Controversial Behavioral Procedure”

2. Introduction (Start Strong!)

The introduction is where you provide context. Here’s what to include:

Briefly introduce escape extinction as the controversial procedure you’ll be analyzing.
Explain why this procedure is considered controversial.
State the purpose of the paper (to describe the procedure, weigh pros and cons, evaluate ethics, and form a recommendation).

A strong thesis statement at the end of your introduction is a good idea, such as:
“This paper will evaluate escape extinction, analyzing its implementation, pros, cons, and ethical considerations, ultimately making a recommendation based on evidence and ethical analysis.”

3. Controversial Procedure Description

This is the bulk of your paper, where you describe the escape extinction procedure in-depth. Here’s how to structure it:

Define the procedure: What is escape extinction? It’s a behavioral procedure where an individual is prevented from escaping or avoiding an aversive stimulus (e.g., a demand) and eventually the unwanted behavior decreases.
How is the behavior originally maintained?: Explain how the behavior being treated (e.g., tantrums, avoidance behaviors) is reinforced by escaping the aversive stimulus.
Implementation of the procedure: Describe how escape extinction is implemented. For example, if a child refuses to do a task, you would withhold escape (no leaving or stopping the task) until the behavior decreases.
Example of implementation: Use a real-life example of escape extinction in a classroom or therapy setting.

Make sure to cite reputable sources within the text when you describe the procedure. For example:
“Escape extinction works by preventing the escape behavior, thus decreasing the behavior over time (Author, Date).”

4. Pros of Escape Extinction

In this section, discuss the advantages of using escape extinction:

Pro 1: Effectiveness in reducing problem behaviors – Escape extinction can be effective in decreasing undesirable behaviors that are reinforced by escape.
Pro 2: Consistency and predictability – This approach provides a clear and consistent response to problem behavior, ensuring that the child understands that escape is not an option.
Pro 3: Positive long-term results – While there may be short-term resistance, this technique can lead to long-term behavioral improvements when consistently applied.

For each pro, provide context and explain why it supports the use of escape extinction. Be sure to cite information from reputable sources. Remember, don’t quote directly, paraphrase in your own words.

5. Cons of Escape Extinction

Now, discuss the downsides of using this procedure:

Con 1: Risk of extinction bursts – The behavior might temporarily increase in intensity before it starts to decrease, causing initial disruption.
Con 2: Emotional side effects – The procedure might cause stress, frustration, or anxiety in the individual undergoing it.
Con 3: Requires careful implementation – The procedure requires close supervision and precise application, or it may not be effective and can lead to negative consequences.

Again, provide context for each con and cite reputable sources in your own words.

6. Evaluation of Ethics

Here, you’ll evaluate the ethical implications of using escape extinction by applying four BACB ethics codes. Here’s a guide:

Code 1: Competence – A behavior analyst must use procedures that they are competent in and that have evidence supporting their effectiveness. How might escape extinction violate this code, or how could it be aligned with it?
Code 2: Integrity – Is there any risk of the behavior analyst using escape extinction in an inappropriate manner? How could they act with integrity?
Code 3: Respect for Persons – Does the use of escape extinction respect the dignity of the individual? Could it violate their rights or cause undue stress?
Code 4: Protection of Participants – Does the procedure protect the individual from harm? How can a behavior analyst ensure they are not causing harm during the implementation of escape extinction?

In your evaluation, make sure to provide a detailed analysis of how a behavior analyst could potentially violate each code or how they could align with the code, followed by evidence-based reasoning.

Recommendation: Finally, based on your pros, cons, and ethics evaluation, make a clear recommendation on whether you would endorse the use of escape extinction.

7. Conclusion

In the conclusion, you should:

Summarize the key points you’ve made.
Reiterate whether or not you would recommend the use of escape extinction based on your evaluation.
Mention why the ethical considerations are critical in deciding whether or not to use the procedure.

Don’t just summarize; synthesize the information to leave the reader with a clear sense of your position on the controversial procedure.

8. Final Touches

References: Ensure all references are cited in APA format. Include peer-reviewed journal articles and reputable sources you used throughout the paper.
Title Page: Don’t forget to include a title page in APA format.

Conclusion

Now that you have a roadmap for tackling this assignment, you’re well on your way to writing an insightful, well-structured paper on escape extinction. Stay focused on addressing the specifics of each section, and use the outline to guide your analysis. Always cite reputable sources and make sure your paper stays balanced by discussing both the pros and cons.

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

WRITE MY ESSAY

blitz