blitz

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Controversial procedure is escape extinction
In this section, fully describe the evidence-based controversial procedure identified in the announcement using information from at least one reputable source (if using more than one, at least one must be a research article from a peer reviewed journal). Describe what it might look like to implement the controversial treatment. How is the behavior originally maintained? What happens once the procedure is implemented?  It can help by giving examples of how this procedure could be implemented. Include within the body of each paragraph an in-text citation for the source you obtained the information regarding the specific procedure (e.g. (Author, Date)). This section is worth 20% of your grade.
Pros to Controversial Treatment
In this section, discuss (in your own words) 3-4 pros of the identified evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these pros (i.e., explain why each pro supports the use of the controversial treatment), and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be used so you can convey your understanding in your own words. This section is worth 10% of your grade.
Cons to Controversial Treatment
In this section, discuss (in your own words) 3-4 cons of the identified evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these cons (i.e., explain why each con opposes the use of the controversial treatment), and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be used, as you can convey your understanding in your own words. This section is worth 10% of your grade.
Evaluation of Ethics
In this section, evaluate the evidence-based controversial treatment using at least four of the BACB ethics codes and justify your opinion on the topic. Provide the specific code numbers and titles of the codes you discuss. Do not copy/paste the code description; instead, explain them in your own words to avoid plagiarism and demonstrate academic scholarly work. Discuss how each code relates to the treatment and analyze both how a behavior analyst could potentially violate the code and how they could act in alignment with it. For example: “A behavior analyst might violate Ethics Code X.XX if they were to recommend the use of [treatment] because…. On the other hand, they could demonstrate alignment with the ethics code if they were to….” Cite and reference the . Finally, for a distinguished score, make sure to summarize whether you would recommend the treatment based on the pros, cons, and ethics codes to justify your opinion. This section is worth 40% of your grade. BACB Ethics Codes for Behavior Analysts. Finally, for a distinguished score, make sure to summarize whether you would recommend the treatment based on the pros, cons, and ethics codes to justify your opinion. This section is worth 40% of your grade.
Conclusion
In academic writing, the conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research/discussion points should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. A conclusion is not merely a summary of your points or a re-statement of your research problem/discussion but a synthesis of key points.

 

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide for Structuring Your Paper

---

1. Introduction: Present the Topic

• What to include:
  • Introduce the controversial procedure you will discuss (Escape Extinction).
  • Define the procedure briefly, highlighting its relevance in behavior analysis or therapy.
  • Provide a brief overview of the goals of your paper and what each section will address (pros, cons, ethical evaluation, etc.).

2. Controversial Procedure: Escape Extinction

• What to include:
  • Description of the Procedure:
    • Define escape extinction, explaining it in the context of behavior analysis (e.g., it involves removing the opportunity for an individual to escape an aversive situation, thus reinforcing the desired behavior).
  • Evidence from Reputable Source:
    • Cite a reputable source to back up your explanation, especially peer-reviewed research.
    • Example: (Author, Year) – This could include a journal article or textbook providing evidence on the effectiveness and usage of escape extinction.
  • Behavior Maintenance and Impact of Procedure:
    • Discuss how the behavior is originally maintained (e.g., an individual’s undesirable behavior is maintained by escaping an aversive task).
    • Explain what happens once the procedure is implemented (e.g., the undesirable behavior may decrease as the individual no longer escapes the task).
  • Examples of Implementation:
    • Provide concrete examples of how escape extinction might be used in a therapy or educational setting, with specific behaviors being targeted and how the procedure is carried out.

3. Pros to Controversial Treatment

• What to include:
  • Identify 3-4 pros of escape extinction based on evidence.
  • For each pro:
    • Explain why it supports the use of escape extinction (e.g., improved behavior outcomes, decreased problematic behaviors).
    • Provide context for each pro and reference at least one reputable source to support your points.
  • Example: “One pro is that escape extinction can lead to more consistent behavior patterns and reduction in avoidance behavior (Author, Year). This is crucial in environments where avoidance behaviors are impeding progress.”

4. Cons to Controversial Treatment

• What to include:
  • Identify 3-4 cons of escape extinction.
  • For each con:
    • Explain why it is a disadvantage (e.g., potential for increased aggression or emotional distress).
    • Provide context for each con and reference a reputable source to support your claims.
  • Example: “A major con is that the procedure may lead to temporary increases in undesirable behaviors, such as aggression, before the target behavior decreases (Author, Year). This can create challenges in maintaining a positive environment for the individual.”

5. Evaluation of Ethics

• What to include:
  • Discuss how escape extinction aligns with the BACB ethics codes. Choose at least four relevant codes (e.g., Code 2.09 – Treatment/Intervention Integrity, Code 4.01 – Integrity of Professional Practice).
  • For each code:
    • Explain how a behavior analyst could violate the code when using escape extinction.
    • Provide suggestions on how the behavior analyst could act in alignment with the code.
  • Example: “A behavior analyst might violate Code 4.01 (Integrity of Professional Practice) if they were to implement escape extinction without adequately considering the emotional or behavioral effects on the client. On the other hand, they could align with this code by ensuring thorough monitoring and adjustments based on the client’s response to the treatment.”
• Final Recommendation:
  • Based on your evaluation of the pros, cons, and ethics codes, provide a final recommendation on whether escape extinction should be used in practice. Justify your position by referring back to the ethical considerations and evidence presented earlier in the paper.

6. Conclusion

• What to include:
  • Summarize the key points of your paper: the procedure, pros, cons, ethical considerations, and final recommendation.
  • Explain why the topic is important for behavior analysts and practitioners in the field.
  • Emphasize the importance of considering both the scientific evidence and ethical standards when implementing behavior change procedures like escape extinction.

---

SEO Title for Your Assignment:

“Escape Extinction in Behavior Analysis: Pros, Cons, and Ethical Considerations”

This title encapsulates the core focus of your paper and is optimized for SEO purposes. Let me know if you need any further adjustments or explanations!

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

WRITE MY ESSAY