blitz

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Write a narrative critique of the quantitative, descriiptive research article using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. and Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary ToolLinks to an external site.. Your critique should be in paragraph format.
Present an overview of the article’s findings.
Discuss how the article findings relate to the practice problem.
Explain how the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool assists in the critique of the article about your practice problem.
The reference page must be in the correct APA format.
Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool is included with the assignment.
Accurately completes all sections in the Article Summary Information on pages 1-3.
Enter the Evidence level and quality rating.
Enter the robust study findings.
Complete the quantitative and quality sections, and all boxes are completed on page 2.
The Quantitative appraisal is completed as A, B, or C on page 3.
Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Tool is included with the assignment.
All columns are completed and are accurate.
Use the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool to summarize the descriiptive study and complete all columns accurately.
Enter a complete current APA formatted reference and permalink.
Enter the research paradigm and research study design.
Enter detailed information about the sampling plan, size, and setting.
Include the specific intervention, and/or explicit information on what the researcher was studying.
Enter in detail the findings by the researcher.
Describe the tools used or how outcomes were measured. Include Cronbach alpha if a tool was used.
Enter limitations described by the researcher. Also, add your appraisal if limitations were not described.
Enter the level of the research study and the quality. Transfer this from the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool.
Scholarly writing is in the third person.
Title page required
Length: 1-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced
12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
Use of level 1 headers to separate each section
References and citations in proper APA format (current version)
In-text citations
Reference page required
Standard English usage and mechanics
No spelling or typographical errors
PS: The journal reference has already been chosen for this paper. This should be used to write the critique. Also, a completed research appraisal tool will be attached and should be used for the critique.
Kong, X., Wang, M., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Global burden of atrial fibrillation attributable to high body mass index from 1990 to 2021: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 24(1), 542–12.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04202-5

 

Here are the guidelines for your narrative critique based on the requirements provided:

---

Narrative Critique Guidelines:

1. Overview of the Article’s Findings:
   • Purpose: Summarize the main findings of the article, highlighting the primary outcomes or conclusions of the research.
   • Focus: Emphasize what the authors discovered about the global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) attributable to high body mass index (BMI), and the implications of these findings.
   • Structure: Provide a clear and concise summary of the article, focusing on the results without getting bogged down in too much detail.
2. Relation to the Practice Problem:
   • Purpose: Connect the findings from the article to the broader healthcare or clinical practice issue you are addressing (e.g., atrial fibrillation prevention, obesity management).
   • Explanation: How does this study inform or impact your practice problem (e.g., managing cardiovascular conditions or the role of BMI in developing AF)?
   • Connection: Describe how understanding the relationship between BMI and AF contributes to better clinical practices or health interventions.
3. Use of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool:
   • Purpose: Discuss how the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool helps you critique the article.
   • Components to Cover:
     • Research Paradigm: Identify and explain the research paradigm used in the article (e.g., epidemiological).
     • Study Design: Describe the study design (e.g., descriptive study).
     • Sampling Plan & Sample Size: Summarize how participants were selected and the number of participants included in the study.
     • Findings: Present the most important findings and how they were measured (mention tools used, e.g., Cronbach alpha for reliability).
     • Limitations: Explain any limitations described in the article and add your own critique if limitations were not addressed.
     • Evidence Rating: Based on the appraisal tools, provide the evidence level and quality (A, B, C).
     • Critique: Offer a short critique on how the tool guided you in evaluating the article.
4. Structure of the Critique:
   • Title Page: Ensure a title page with proper APA format.
   • Length: The critique should be 1-2 pages, excluding the title page and references.
   • Font & Spacing: Use 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and double-spacing.
   • Headings: Use level 1 headers to separate each section (e.g., “Overview of the Article’s Findings,” “Relation to the Practice Problem,” etc.).
   • References: Include an APA-formatted reference page with proper citations.
   • Writing Style: Use third-person writing. Maintain professional, scholarly tone and avoid typographical/spelling errors.
5. References:
   • In-text Citations: Provide in-text citations where necessary, following the APA format.
   • Reference List: Ensure all references are cited correctly, including the article you critique and any additional sources you use.

---

APA Formatting Checklist:

• Title Page: Proper title, your name, and the institution’s name centered on the page.
• Headers: Use level 1 headers for each section of your critique.
• Citations: Ensure all citations are in APA format, both in-text and in the references section.
• Spacing: Double-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font.
• Grammar and Mechanics: Use standard English with no typographical or spelling errors.

---

Tools to Complete the Critique:

• Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool: Use this to assess the level and quality of the study, as well as to summarize key findings.
• Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool: This tool will help you complete the structured critique of the research article in a systematic manner, ensuring you capture all relevant aspects of the study design, findings, and limitations.

---

Steps to Follow:

1. Review the article thoroughly and highlight key findings and methodology.
2. Complete the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool for the article to assess its level and quality.
3. Use the Individual Evidence Summary Tool to summarize the study’s key elements.
4. Write the narrative critique, following the structure outlined above.
5. Submit the critique with proper citations and reference list in APA format.

Let me know if you need further assistance with any of the sections!

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

WRITE MY ESSAY