blitz

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

1. Select three tools of criticism that are best suited for understanding your proposed text/artifact and illustrate your understanding of those three tools of criticism
2. Justify why you have selected these tools and what they will allow you to assess/analyze/understand/intervene in.
3. Research and describe how other critics have discussed your artifact (or something similar)
TOOLS:
Ethnocentrism
Afrocentrism
Historical Reflexivity
Displacing Whiteness
Dougherty & Calafell’s thesis
Carrillo-Rowe’s thesis
Marxist Criticism
Base-Superstructure (materialism) – 3 ways
Cultural Hegemony
Preferred Reading
Standpoint theory
Gender as a Social Construct
Intersectionality
Patriarchy
Properly Public vs. Preferably Private
Hammer’s thesis
Importance of Context
Rhetoric of the Image
Partial Seeing
Visual Freezing
Rhetorical Invention
Equipment for Living
Identification
Genre
Access to voice
Griffin’s Thesis

TOOLBOXS
Toolbox: culture centered criticism
Toolbox: Marxist crisiisiticm
Toolbox: feminist criticism
Toolbox: visual criticism
Toolbox: narative crisitsim

 

 

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment

In this assignment, you are asked to select three tools of criticism to analyze a proposed text or artifact. You will also need to justify why you selected these tools and describe how other critics have discussed the artifact or something similar. The goal is to use criticism tools to deeply analyze and interpret the artifact, and understand its cultural, historical, or social implications.

Step 2: Selecting the Tools of Criticism

1. Choose Three Tools of Criticism:
   • Review the list of tools provided and select three that you believe will best allow you to analyze and interpret your chosen text/artifact.
   • Think about the nature of the artifact—its cultural, historical, social, or political relevance—and select the tools accordingly. For instance:
     • Ethnocentrism: If your artifact involves cultural conflict or difference, this tool can help you assess how cultural perspectives are framed.
     • Marxist Criticism: Use this tool if your artifact explores class structures, capitalism, or socio-economic issues.
     • Gender as a Social Construct: If the artifact involves gender representations or gender roles, this tool will be highly useful.
2. Rationale for Your Choices:
   • Justify why you chose the three tools you selected. For each tool, explain how it will help you analyze and interpret the artifact’s significance. For instance:
     • Cultural Hegemony can help analyze how dominant cultural practices or ideologies are reinforced in your artifact.
     • Historical Reflexivity may be helpful if your artifact has historical elements that require understanding the socio-political context.
3. Think About Your Chosen Text/Artifact:
   • Whether it’s a piece of literature, film, artwork, or another form of media, ensure that your analysis is grounded in how the tools apply to it specifically.

Step 3: Research Other Critics’ Views

• Explore Existing Criticism: Research how critics have engaged with your artifact or similar ones. Look for academic papers, articles, or books discussing the themes or issues raised by your artifact.
  • Use reliable academic sources to find critiques that align with your chosen tools of criticism.
  • Summarize key points from other critics and describe how their views support or contrast with your own analysis.

Step 4: Develop Your Analysis

Once you have selected your tools and researched critics’ views, it’s time to apply the tools in a meaningful way:

• For each tool, explain how it helps to deepen the analysis of the artifact. Use examples from the artifact to support your arguments.
• For example, Marxist Criticism might reveal how the artifact highlights social class disparities, while Intersectionality may expose how different social categories (e.g., race, gender, class) interact in the artifact’s narrative.

Step 5: Structure the Paper

The structure of your paper should be clear and organized. Here’s how you can break it down:

1. Introduction:
   • Introduce the artifact and provide an overview of the tools you will use.
   • State your thesis: what do you intend to uncover or understand through your chosen tools of criticism?
2. Body Paragraphs:
   • Paragraph 1: Discuss the first tool of criticism you chose. Explain how it applies to the artifact, supported by examples.
   • Paragraph 2: Discuss the second tool and how it sheds light on the artifact. Provide concrete evidence from the artifact.
   • Paragraph 3: Discuss the third tool and analyze the artifact through this lens. Again, use examples.
   • Paragraph 4 (Optional): Discuss other critics’ views on the artifact or similar works and compare them to your own analysis.
3. Conclusion:
   • Summarize the insights you gained through applying the three tools of criticism.
   • Reflect on the implications of your analysis. How do these tools contribute to a deeper understanding of the artifact and its social, historical, or cultural context?

Step 6: Finalize the Paper

• Review and Revise: Ensure your analysis is coherent and supported by examples. Revise for clarity, grammar, and structure.
• References: Cite all the sources you used in your research, including the critics’ discussions of the artifact.

 

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

WRITE MY ESSAY