Other : Diversity 2025 Archives - blitz https://tufan.blitzarchive.com/category/other-diversity-2025/ tufan Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:42:02 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 241003612 Constructing Conversations About Diversity: A Critical Analysis https://tufan.blitzarchive.com/2025/01/24/constructing-conversations-about-diversity-a-critical-analysis/ https://tufan.blitzarchive.com/2025/01/24/constructing-conversations-about-diversity-a-critical-analysis/#respond Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:42:02 +0000 https://tufan.blitzarchive.com/?p=2597 Overview For this activity, you will critically analyze how those within your chosen population engage with your topic. You will identify what is already working well and opportunities for change. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission. Directions In this activity, you will consider the elements of your topic you can develop to encourage, promote, and transform conversations about diversity. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. You should continue to gather the sources you will integrate into your final project, which include two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance in finding evidence and resources from outside the course. For this activity, you will discuss how to collaborate constructively with your chosen population group. You will then describe at least one positive element related to your topic and, finally, one element that could benefit from change. You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis. It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work. You will be evaluated on both criteria. Discuss how you would constructively collaborate with your population to encourage their engagement with your chosen topic. Consider how you would develop a dialogue with your population about the topic you have chosen. What are your ideas for supporting constructive and inclusive conversation and programs of engagement? Describe at least one positive element within your topic that supports transformation. What conversational and collaborative approaches have already been successful? Visualize how this positive element could have a ripple effect towards a transformative conversation about your topic. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence. If you do not think your topic has been engaged with positively or successfully, explain why you have come to this conclusion. Describe at least one specific element within your topic that could benefit from change. What potential opportunities are there to improve your topic? What could be done differently to encourage, promote, or transform your topic? Build off ways that your topic has been discussed and represented in the past. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence. Resources https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/articles-and-essays/introduction-to-the-wpa-slave-narratives/importance-of-the-slave-narratives-collection/ https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/articles-and-essays/introduction-to-the-wpa-slave-narratives/limitations-of-the-slave-narrative-collection/ https://journals.ala.org/index.php/rusq/article/view/6604/8823   Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily! Step-by-Step Guide for Structuring Your Critical Analysis Paper Step 1: Review the Assignment Prompt Carefully read the assignment […]

The post Constructing Conversations About Diversity: A Critical Analysis appeared first on blitz.

]]> Overview
For this activity, you will critically analyze how those within your chosen population engage with your topic. You will identify what is already working well and opportunities for change. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.
Directions
In this activity, you will consider the elements of your topic you can develop to encourage, promote, and transform conversations about diversity. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. You should continue to gather the sources you will integrate into your final project, which include two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance in finding evidence and resources from outside the course. For this activity, you will discuss how to collaborate constructively with your chosen population group. You will then describe at least one positive element related to your topic and, finally, one element that could benefit from change.
You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
You will be evaluated on both criteria.
Discuss how you would constructively collaborate with your population to encourage their engagement with your chosen topic.
Consider how you would develop a dialogue with your population about the topic you have chosen. What are your ideas for supporting constructive and inclusive conversation and programs of engagement?
Describe at least one positive element within your topic that supports transformation.
What conversational and collaborative approaches have already been successful? Visualize how this positive element could have a ripple effect towards a transformative conversation about your topic. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.
If you do not think your topic has been engaged with positively or successfully, explain why you have come to this conclusion.
Describe at least one specific element within your topic that could benefit from change.
What potential opportunities are there to improve your topic? What could be done differently to encourage, promote, or transform your topic? Build off ways that your topic has been discussed and represented in the past. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.
Resources
https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/articles-and-essays/introduction-to-the-wpa-slave-narratives/importance-of-the-slave-narratives-collection/
https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-writers-project-1936-to-1938/articles-and-essays/introduction-to-the-wpa-slave-narratives/limitations-of-the-slave-narrative-collection/
https://journals.ala.org/index.php/rusq/article/view/6604/8823

 

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide for Structuring Your Critical Analysis Paper

Step 1: Review the Assignment Prompt

  • Carefully read the assignment prompt and ensure you understand the key components:
    • Integration of evidence from varied sources.
    • Constructive collaboration with your chosen population.
    • Identification of positive and changeable elements related to your topic.

Step 2: Use a Structured Outline

1. Introduction

  • Begin by introducing your chosen topic and population group.
  • Briefly explain the significance of your topic in encouraging conversations about diversity.
  • State your thesis, summarizing the key points of your critical analysis.

2. Integrate Reliable Evidence

  • Throughout your analysis, incorporate reliable evidence from course materials and external sources (e.g., the WPA Slave Narratives or scholarly journals).
  • Ensure evidence supports your analysis of current practices, successful elements, and opportunities for change.

3. Constructive Collaboration

  • Discuss how you would collaborate with your chosen population to foster engagement.
  • Include specific strategies, such as:
    • Hosting inclusive workshops or events.
    • Encouraging storytelling or oral histories to create empathy.
    • Partnering with community leaders to co-develop programs.
  • Focus on methods to build trust and dialogue, ensuring diverse voices are represented.

4. Positive Element Supporting Transformation

  • Identify one successful element within your topic that has sparked meaningful change.
  • Example: The WPA Slave Narratives provided a platform for formerly enslaved individuals to share their stories, promoting understanding of historical and cultural realities.
  • Analyze how such approaches could inspire broader conversations about diversity and transformation.
  • Support your discussion with evidence from reliable sources.

5. Element Needing Change

  • Highlight an area within your topic that could be improved.
  • Example: The limitations of the WPA Slave Narratives (e.g., interviewer biases, incomplete narratives) demonstrate the need for more inclusive and representative storytelling.
  • Propose actionable changes, such as:
    • Expanding narratives to include diverse perspectives.
    • Ensuring that researchers and interviewers are culturally competent.
  • Back your ideas with evidence to show the potential for impact.

6. Conclusion

  • Summarize your findings, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and transformation in addressing your topic.
  • Reiterate how your suggestions could foster inclusive and constructive dialogue.

Step 3: APA In-Text Citations and Reference List

  • Cite all sources used in your paper, ensuring you follow APA guidelines.
  • Include a reference list at the end of your paper.

Step 4: Proofread and Finalize

  • Check for grammar, coherence, and adherence to APA style.
  • Ensure that your paper integrates evidence seamlessly and aligns with the rubric criteria.

Helpful Resources for Evidence

The post Constructing Conversations About Diversity: A Critical Analysis appeared first on blitz.

]]> https://tufan.blitzarchive.com/2025/01/24/constructing-conversations-about-diversity-a-critical-analysis/feed/ 0 2597